CVs are included to ascertain the expertise of the proposal submitters in the area of the review. It is important to note that submitters need not be “senior scholars” with an extensive publication record. Rather, including CVs is a way for the editors in chief (NOT the reviewers) to make an assessment of the expertise of the submission team as a whole in studying the topic area of the review. CVs MUST be marked as “Supplementary File NOT for Review.”
Articles in this section
- What kinds of papers does ANNALS publish?
- What kinds of papers does ANNALS not publish? How are ANNALS papers different from AMR papers?
- What is the journal’s submission and publication schedule?
- What is the journal’s Open Access Policy?
- How do I subscribe to ANNALS?
- What is the journal’s impact factor?
- How do authors go about submitting work to ANNALS?
- What kinds of proposals are a good fit for ANNALS?
- What are the page limits for proposal submissions? How do I format my submission correctly?
- What is the review process at ANNALS? Are submissions blind reviewed? When will I hear back about my submission?