ANNALS does not accept submissions of a previously rejected proposal. The guiding principle here is the literature on which the proposed review is based. In a sense, the literature one reviews is the ANNALS analogy of data for empirical journal submissions. Just as empirical journals such as AMJ do not accept submission of a paper based on data on which a previously rejected paper was based, ANNALS does not accept proposals for a review of a literature on substantially the same literature, for which an earlier proposal was rejected. When there is overlap in the literature reviewed but not complete overlap, the extent to which the literature reviewed is too similar to qualify for a new submission or different enough to qualify for a resubmission is an assessment made by the Editors in Chief. When you submit a proposal based on the same literature as a previously rejected proposal on the assumption that the literatures reviewed are different enough, ANNALS expects you to alert the Editors to this overlap and the submission history in a cover letter.
Articles in this section
- What kinds of papers does ANNALS publish?
- What kinds of papers does ANNALS not publish? How are ANNALS papers different from AMR papers?
- What is the journal’s submission and publication schedule?
- What is the journal’s Open Access Policy?
- How do I subscribe to ANNALS?
- What is the journal’s impact factor?
- How do authors go about submitting work to ANNALS?
- What kinds of proposals are a good fit for ANNALS?
- What are the page limits for proposal submissions? How do I format my submission correctly?
- What is the review process at ANNALS? Are submissions blind reviewed? When will I hear back about my submission?
Comments
0 comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.